Author Archives: DRASTIC Research Team

Understanding COVID-19 and Seasonal Influenza as Quasispecies Mutant Swarms Reveals the Quantum Origins and Cryptic Fates of Human Pandemics

From the co-author of the first peer-reviewed paper examining a laboratory origin for SARS-CoV-2, as well as its addendum, which formally linked the H1N1 Spanish Flu pandemic strain release of 1977 to gain-of-function research.

WHO knows? We still can’t be sure of Covid’s origins

Could Covid-19 have originated from a Chinese lab accident? When the virus was first identified, many pointed out that it was close to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. It sounded like a conspiracy theory. But it’s all too plausible. And there are questions that the long-awaited report by the World Health Organisation leaves unanswered.

In 2018, Chinese Academy of Sciences initiated a “Special Project” to develop among other things – new vaccines

Saying this out loud: In 2018, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) initiated a “Special Project” to develop – among other things – new vaccines based on Shi Zhengli’s bat coronavirus research.

2. Investigation of RaTG13 and the 7896 Clade

Ignore the Doctored WHO “Joint Report” Read what they forgot to investigate! https://researchgate.net/publication/350515493_INVESTIGATION_OF_RaTG13_AND_THE_7896_CLADE… which builds on the groundbreaking work by @franciscodeasis @MonaRahalkar @BahulikarRahul @Daoyu15 @interne41914499 @TheSeeker268 and many anonymous investigators

The RaTg13 S does not bind to any ACE2 with affinity and entry capacity that is viable for Sarbecoviruses.

The RaTg13 S does not bind to any ACE2 with affinity and entry capacity that is viable for Sarbecoviruses. This includes both human ACE2 and ACE2 Ra4331, which had even lower binding efficiency and infection efficiency than human ACE2. (Click on image for large view) The SARS-CoV-2 S is uniquely adapted to human ACE2. Reference:Continue reading “The RaTg13 S does not bind to any ACE2 with affinity and entry capacity that is viable for Sarbecoviruses.”

Controversies in Annexe D7 of the WHO report

1. The  WHO joint team report assumes that all the research was done in P3 and P4 probably because of their presence! On the contrary, Zhengli Shi, the principal scientist of the coronavirus research in WIV said that they did all the coronavirus research in P2 and P3 labs (Science, July 2020 Q and A)Continue reading “Controversies in Annexe D7 of the WHO report”

Response to China-WHO Report

Open Letter to the World Health Organization and the Members of its Executive Board (April 30 2021) Open Letter: Calls for Further Inquiries Into Coronavirus Origins SARS-CoV-2: WHO-China report dismisses lab-origin hypothesis as being ‘extremely unlikely’ – By Annette Gartland @netpoette Twitter Thread by Jamie Metzl @JamieMetzl Open letter and video from Dr Steven QuayContinue reading “Response to China-WHO Report”

Coronavirus: What is “DRASTIC”, the independent collective investigating the origin of the epidemic?

Coronavirus : Qu’est-ce que « DRASTIC », le collectif indépendant qui enquête sur l’origine de l’épidémie ? C’est l’un des rapports les plus attendus de l’histoire. Les premières conclusions de l’enquête conjointe menée par les experts de l’OMS et de la Chine sur les origines de l’épidémie de coronavirus privilégie l’hypothèse d’une transmission du virus à l’homme par l’intermédiaire d’un animal infecté par uneContinue reading “Coronavirus: What is “DRASTIC”, the independent collective investigating the origin of the epidemic?”