Charles Rixey @CharlesRixey It’s been argued that the source of SARS-CoV-2 is ‘proximal’But the zoonosis emergence hypothesis is hardly optimalTo whit, the phylogenetic evidence is bluntly paradoxicalA lab origin is causa sine qua non; wholly tautologicalIpso facto, a ‘proximal’ zoonosis is [in truth] mythologicalDaszak’s ‘evidence’ is much like his ‘scientific consensus:’ apocryphal We’re told thatContinue reading “The Apocryphal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”
Following on @CNN‘s poor coverage of the debate around COVID-19’s origins, @npwcnn also fails to do justice to the amount of “coincidences” that definitely point to a lab scenario. Illustrated thread.
Happy Birthday #drastic , you are 1 year old!
Debunking the KG anderson “FCS not a great deal” claim.
🚨🚨🚨 Gear up. Revealing three theses from Wuhan Institute of Virology which provides new details on Mojiang sampling, 4991 genome, 7896-clade, unpublished CoVs, coronavirus reverse genetics and more! All theses were supervised by Shi Zhengli. Links at the end of the thread.
1. Sars-CoV-2, aux origines du mal (now available)By @BricePerrier A plethora of references to the work of #DRASTIQUE Please RT especially to French Friendshttps://t.co/Qmci2lTlLe208 Pages 17,00 €ISBN : 978-2-410-02415-9Impression: Noir et blancorhttps://t.co/FV7Sf4emo5 https://t.co/msf4dFNkes
Mystery of Q498: SARS-CoV-2 appears to be the only member of it’s entire clade that bind human but not mouse.