Ignore the Doctored WHO “Joint Report” Read what they forgot to investigate! https://researchgate.net/publication/350515493_INVESTIGATION_OF_RaTG13_AND_THE_7896_CLADE… which builds on the groundbreaking work by @franciscodeasis @MonaRahalkar @BahulikarRahul @Daoyu15 @interne41914499 @TheSeeker268 and many anonymous investigators
The RaTg13 S does not bind to any ACE2 with affinity and entry capacity that is viable for Sarbecoviruses. This includes both human ACE2 and ACE2 Ra4331, which had even lower binding efficiency and infection efficiency than human ACE2. (Click on image for large view) The SARS-CoV-2 S is uniquely adapted to human ACE2. Reference:Continue reading “The RaTg13 S does not bind to any ACE2 with affinity and entry capacity that is viable for Sarbecoviruses.”
@Daoyu15 smashes Goldstein’s broom as he tries to sweep away Redfield’s claim:The “sweep” was observed in ALL isolate sequences including WH04 & is a signature of pre-adaptation (all human isolate were A372 including WH04) not “early rapid adaptation”https://t.co/uYol0oEP6Y
New Paper contributed by several DRASTIC members. “Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?” No, definitely we should not.
Peter Daszak said there is NO Evidence at all that the virus was created and leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology(The WIV). Dr. Yan @DrLiMengYAN1 revealed last August 5 that WHO is helping #CCP cover up the truth of #COVID19
The WIV “visit” is a sham. Remember that in a real investigation ALL lab data must be examined—not whatever few the WIV cherry-picked to stuff up the 3 hours of non-lab “visit” or whatever the WIV have cherry-picked to “disclose” to cover the rest of the